<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Beaney Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rachelbeaney.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rachelbeaney.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lolspeak: moar than just cute kitties by Ayla85</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/12/29/lolspeak-moar-than-just-cute-kitties/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayla85</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=762#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Very cute, I love that sweety kitty. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cute, I love that sweety kitty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rebecca v Jessi: Should we be putting online reputation management in schools? by Cynnie10</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/04/30/rebecca-v-jessi-should-we-be-putting-online-reputation-management-in-schools/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynnie10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=507#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I think Friday is her best song ever because it brought her into fame. I read an article that she is back with another video &quot;Person of Interest&quot;. Do you think it&#039;ll be another hit like Friday?   You can read the full article here http://www.sickchirpse.com/2011/11/16/person-of-interest-rebecca-black-has-a-new-music-video/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Friday is her best song ever because it brought her into fame. I read an article that she is back with another video &#8220;Person of Interest&#8221;. Do you think it&#8217;ll be another hit like Friday?   You can read the full article here <a href="http://www.sickchirpse.com/2011/11/16/person-of-interest-rebecca-black-has-a-new-music-video/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sickchirpse.com/2011/11/16/person-of-interest-rebecca-black-has-a-new-music-video/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What interactive fiction storytellers can learn from Old Spice vs Fabio by Beaney</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/08/01/what-interactive-fiction-storytellers-can-learn-from-old-spice-vs-fabio/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Beaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 04:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=602#comment-47</guid>
		<description>It is indeed! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What interactive fiction storytellers can learn from Old Spice vs Fabio by cale</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/08/01/what-interactive-fiction-storytellers-can-learn-from-old-spice-vs-fabio/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>cale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 03:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=602#comment-46</guid>
		<description>It was a disappointing campaign from the awesomeness of the first campaign. The public also probable expected too much, because with the first campaign the bar was set very high, and then they failed to jump it where they set it with the first campaign.

Ah well, another lesson for the rest of the creatives in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a disappointing campaign from the awesomeness of the first campaign. The public also probable expected too much, because with the first campaign the bar was set very high, and then they failed to jump it where they set it with the first campaign.</p>
<p>Ah well, another lesson for the rest of the creatives in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Status Updates: let&#039;s stop lying by Paul</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/07/03/status-updates-lets-stop-lying/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 01:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=593#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Rachelface, I reckon I can speak to online interaction being one of the main forms of communication throughout... oh, probably over half my life now, and I just don&#039;t agree with the idea of this being a &quot;generational thing.&quot;

&quot;Very few platforms allow any kind of real conversation or space to genuinely share how you feel.&quot;

Every platform does this. People don&#039;t always do this.

&quot;I think in real life we show we are more human and flawed, whereas online, there is no opportunity for that.&quot;

Are you certain?
http://youropenbook.org/?q=i%27m+not+racist+but&amp;gender=any
http://twistori.com/#i_feel

&quot;There are far more emotions in humans than just those two – yet why are they the ones we most commonly see? (Or is it just some of the people I know? ;))&quot;

These two make significant impact on your current state of mind, either &quot;WHOOHOOO!&quot; and &quot;FUUUUUU!&quot; are explosive feelings, and sharing them is entirely natural - so they&#039;re likely to occur far more often. It&#039;s all about feeling better. You&#039;re celebrating? People will celebrate with you. Miserable? Then you&#039;ll get some commiseration.
As for whether it&#039;s just the people you follow... maybe. My various streams are generally packed full of interesting articles, links and tidbits, as well as charming or banal snippets of people&#039;s lives, positive, neutral and negative all.

However, when one of my friend&#039;s truly has a problem - sure I&#039;ll hear about it, but not in a public update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachelface, I reckon I can speak to online interaction being one of the main forms of communication throughout&#8230; oh, probably over half my life now, and I just don&#8217;t agree with the idea of this being a &#8220;generational thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Very few platforms allow any kind of real conversation or space to genuinely share how you feel.&#8221;</p>
<p>Every platform does this. People don&#8217;t always do this.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think in real life we show we are more human and flawed, whereas online, there is no opportunity for that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you certain?<br />
<a href="http://youropenbook.org/?q=i%27m+not+racist+but&#038;gender=any" rel="nofollow">http://youropenbook.org/?q=i%27m+not+racist+but&#038;gender=any</a><br />
<a href="http://twistori.com/#i_feel" rel="nofollow">http://twistori.com/#i_feel</a></p>
<p>&#8220;There are far more emotions in humans than just those two – yet why are they the ones we most commonly see? (Or is it just some of the people I know? ;))&#8221;</p>
<p>These two make significant impact on your current state of mind, either &#8220;WHOOHOOO!&#8221; and &#8220;FUUUUUU!&#8221; are explosive feelings, and sharing them is entirely natural &#8211; so they&#8217;re likely to occur far more often. It&#8217;s all about feeling better. You&#8217;re celebrating? People will celebrate with you. Miserable? Then you&#8217;ll get some commiseration.<br />
As for whether it&#8217;s just the people you follow&#8230; maybe. My various streams are generally packed full of interesting articles, links and tidbits, as well as charming or banal snippets of people&#8217;s lives, positive, neutral and negative all.</p>
<p>However, when one of my friend&#8217;s truly has a problem &#8211; sure I&#8217;ll hear about it, but not in a public update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Status Updates: let&#039;s stop lying by Alegrya</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/07/03/status-updates-lets-stop-lying/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Alegrya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=593#comment-44</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a tricky subject. Be totally honest about what you&#039;re feeling and if you&#039;re sad/down/tired too much people quickly tell you to STFU. Be only positive and risk appearing creepy and Stepford as you mentioned.

I find that I&#039;m much more honest on the networks and accounts where I&#039;ve got privacy settings in place and smaller numbers of people able to see updates compared to my public, identifying twitter account. Uncertain whether it&#039;s a good balance or not but one can only try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a tricky subject. Be totally honest about what you&#8217;re feeling and if you&#8217;re sad/down/tired too much people quickly tell you to STFU. Be only positive and risk appearing creepy and Stepford as you mentioned.</p>
<p>I find that I&#8217;m much more honest on the networks and accounts where I&#8217;ve got privacy settings in place and smaller numbers of people able to see updates compared to my public, identifying twitter account. Uncertain whether it&#8217;s a good balance or not but one can only try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Status Updates: let&#039;s stop lying by Beaney</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/07/03/status-updates-lets-stop-lying/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Beaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=593#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments!

Cafedave, that&#039;s a good question. I think the kinds of responses I&#039;d hope for are responses which challenge the idea that emotions are simply for private messages. Responses like &quot;I had an experience like that recently, I helped to do x&quot; hopefully are what I&#039;d aim for.

Zander - this post made me laugh; and while I think it&#039;s true. I think I have a slightly different perspective. Yes, in real life, we show our good side (like our good holiday snaps), but we&#039;re also likely to joke and fold and show our bad angles, too. I think in real life we show we are more human and flawed, whereas online, there is no opportunity for that.

Maybe my perspective is a generational one: most of my interactions with my friends are online. Very few platforms allow any kind of real conversation or space to genuinely share how you feel.

However, I think you make a fair point about everyone using every social network as a platform for missing their ex (etc, etc); and I know there are private online spaces to deal with issues in depth; but what I&#039;m wanting to challenge is not people simply saying &quot;I&#039;m sad&quot;; but to be richer in the things they do share in a public forum.

What I&#039;m really trying to explore is to break away from the status updates that are:
1) I&#039;m incredible - check me out here.
2) I don&#039;t deserve what the world has done.

There are far more emotions in humans than just those two - yet why are they the ones we most commonly see? (Or is it just some of the people I know? ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments!</p>
<p>Cafedave, that&#8217;s a good question. I think the kinds of responses I&#8217;d hope for are responses which challenge the idea that emotions are simply for private messages. Responses like &#8220;I had an experience like that recently, I helped to do x&#8221; hopefully are what I&#8217;d aim for.</p>
<p>Zander &#8211; this post made me laugh; and while I think it&#8217;s true. I think I have a slightly different perspective. Yes, in real life, we show our good side (like our good holiday snaps), but we&#8217;re also likely to joke and fold and show our bad angles, too. I think in real life we show we are more human and flawed, whereas online, there is no opportunity for that.</p>
<p>Maybe my perspective is a generational one: most of my interactions with my friends are online. Very few platforms allow any kind of real conversation or space to genuinely share how you feel.</p>
<p>However, I think you make a fair point about everyone using every social network as a platform for missing their ex (etc, etc); and I know there are private online spaces to deal with issues in depth; but what I&#8217;m wanting to challenge is not people simply saying &#8220;I&#8217;m sad&#8221;; but to be richer in the things they do share in a public forum.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m really trying to explore is to break away from the status updates that are:<br />
1) I&#8217;m incredible &#8211; check me out here.<br />
2) I don&#8217;t deserve what the world has done.</p>
<p>There are far more emotions in humans than just those two &#8211; yet why are they the ones we most commonly see? (Or is it just some of the people I know? ;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Status Updates: let&#039;s stop lying by Paul</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/07/03/status-updates-lets-stop-lying/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=593#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Nah.

Building a positive image for yourself can help reinforce positive thinking and behaviour.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110301202827.htm

I once found a fantastic article illustrating how people can shape happier versions of their lives and attitudes to help change their own state of mind, and so bring those versions closer to reality.
It was a cool thing. I wish I could find it now (just had far too long a look, oops.)

I&#039;m not saying that honesty is a bad policy, I&#039;m just saying that people aren&#039;t necessarily lying, just censoring by omission - and that&#039;s not always a bad thing. It won&#039;t be the case for everyone, but a lot of people are bound to have their support network in place, and that&#039;s going to be people close to them. That&#039;s who they&#039;ll be talking to when they&#039;re sad, probably in private.

I don&#039;t feel any great need to let my negative emotions fly very often in the social space, because... well, it&#039;s not anyone else&#039;s business unless I choose to make it their business. I wouldn&#039;t appreciate commentary on my trials and tribulations from people that I&#039;m connected to, but who don&#039;t actually know me very well. Would you?

That said, your idea of an itty bitty support based social network is a neat one - but don&#039;t you already have this via more private communication channels? Email, SMS, DMs, FB messages, or even some obscure Google product that never really took off?
I think if you do, other people will too.

It&#039;s not about lying, or hiding, it&#039;s about privacy and comfort zones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah.</p>
<p>Building a positive image for yourself can help reinforce positive thinking and behaviour.<br />
<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110301202827.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110301202827.htm</a></p>
<p>I once found a fantastic article illustrating how people can shape happier versions of their lives and attitudes to help change their own state of mind, and so bring those versions closer to reality.<br />
It was a cool thing. I wish I could find it now (just had far too long a look, oops.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that honesty is a bad policy, I&#8217;m just saying that people aren&#8217;t necessarily lying, just censoring by omission &#8211; and that&#8217;s not always a bad thing. It won&#8217;t be the case for everyone, but a lot of people are bound to have their support network in place, and that&#8217;s going to be people close to them. That&#8217;s who they&#8217;ll be talking to when they&#8217;re sad, probably in private.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel any great need to let my negative emotions fly very often in the social space, because&#8230; well, it&#8217;s not anyone else&#8217;s business unless I choose to make it their business. I wouldn&#8217;t appreciate commentary on my trials and tribulations from people that I&#8217;m connected to, but who don&#8217;t actually know me very well. Would you?</p>
<p>That said, your idea of an itty bitty support based social network is a neat one &#8211; but don&#8217;t you already have this via more private communication channels? Email, SMS, DMs, FB messages, or even some obscure Google product that never really took off?<br />
I think if you do, other people will too.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about lying, or hiding, it&#8217;s about privacy and comfort zones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Status Updates: let&#039;s stop lying by Zander</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/07/03/status-updates-lets-stop-lying/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Zander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 23:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=593#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that we interact online that differently from how we do in real life. Facebook is generally for a wider social network, including a lot of acquaintances and colleagues. If you were to show up to a party with those sorts of people in attendance and start talking about why you&#039;re depressed or frustrated, you&#039;d be the person who didn&#039;t get invited next time around. Likewise, you don&#039;t show people the photos from your holiday where you looked like a beached whale, you show them the ones where you look fabulous and you&#039;re having a blast.

Serious and personal sorts of discussions are ones you have with close friends and family, and in person, not things you broadcast over the web. And as much as the web and online life becomes a more and more prominent in our every day activities, let&#039;s hope it never replaces the real and intimate connections that humans have always depended on for emotional health.

At the same time, people already use various online forums for those more personal and anonymous discussions - so there are online outlets for that already. There&#039;s no need to turn every single social networking platform into some loudspeaker for everyone who&#039;s missing their ex or dead childhood pet at any given time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that we interact online that differently from how we do in real life. Facebook is generally for a wider social network, including a lot of acquaintances and colleagues. If you were to show up to a party with those sorts of people in attendance and start talking about why you&#8217;re depressed or frustrated, you&#8217;d be the person who didn&#8217;t get invited next time around. Likewise, you don&#8217;t show people the photos from your holiday where you looked like a beached whale, you show them the ones where you look fabulous and you&#8217;re having a blast.</p>
<p>Serious and personal sorts of discussions are ones you have with close friends and family, and in person, not things you broadcast over the web. And as much as the web and online life becomes a more and more prominent in our every day activities, let&#8217;s hope it never replaces the real and intimate connections that humans have always depended on for emotional health.</p>
<p>At the same time, people already use various online forums for those more personal and anonymous discussions &#8211; so there are online outlets for that already. There&#8217;s no need to turn every single social networking platform into some loudspeaker for everyone who&#8217;s missing their ex or dead childhood pet at any given time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Status Updates: let&#039;s stop lying by cafedave</title>
		<link>http://rachelbeaney.com/2011/07/03/status-updates-lets-stop-lying/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>cafedave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 23:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelbeaney.com/?p=593#comment-40</guid>
		<description>hey beaney

An excellent point. I tend to at least put a positive spin on the bad things that have happened to me (if I mention them at all).

To some extent, that&#039;s a response to people I follow who seem to have a 90/10 split of things that make them angry to things that they&#039;re glad about... it&#039;s tiring to read the updates sometimes.

Were people to take on Honest August, what kind of responses would you want them to be making to the honesty of others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey beaney</p>
<p>An excellent point. I tend to at least put a positive spin on the bad things that have happened to me (if I mention them at all).</p>
<p>To some extent, that&#8217;s a response to people I follow who seem to have a 90/10 split of things that make them angry to things that they&#8217;re glad about&#8230; it&#8217;s tiring to read the updates sometimes.</p>
<p>Were people to take on Honest August, what kind of responses would you want them to be making to the honesty of others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: rachelbeaney.com @ 2012-02-22 22:12:51 -->
